Live

Argument Mapper

Lay out premises and a conclusion, then test its validity.

Best for: essay planning, seminar prep

Open the mapper →
Live

Fallacy Finder

Practise naming the flaw in everyday reasoning.

Best for: critical thinking practice

Try it below ↓
Live

Thought Experiment Lab

Make a choice and see which tradition you sided with.

Best for: classroom discussion

Open the lab →
Live

Glossary

Terms like "a priori" explained in one sentence.

Best for: quick look-ups while reading

Open the glossary →
Coming next

Thinker Compare

Two philosophers side by side on one question.

Best for: revision, compare-and-contrast essays

Coming next

Reading Path Builder

A reading order matched to your level and time.

Best for: self-study

Try it now

Fallacy Finder

Four arguments, four flaws. Read each one and pick the fallacy it commits.

Ad hominem.
Attacking the person, not the argument.
False dilemma.
Offering two options when more exist.
Slippery slope.
Claiming one step must lead to an extreme, without showing why.
Straw man.
Attacking a distorted version of a view.
Question 1 of 4 Score 0

"You can't trust his argument about taxes. He has been divorced twice."

How they fit together

From a question to
a finished argument

  1. Step 1

    Understand the idea

    Read the guide and look up unfamiliar words in the Glossary.

  2. Step 2

    Test your intuition

    Run the matching dilemma in the Thought Experiment Lab.

  3. Step 3

    Build your argument

    Set out your premises and conclusion in the Argument Mapper.

  4. Step 4

    Check for flaws

    Use what you practised in the Fallacy Finder to review your own reasoning.

Have an idea for a tool?

Teachers and students shape what we build next. Tell us what would help.

Suggest a tool

Sources and further reading

The tools on this page are informed by established work in informal logic and philosophy education:

Tools FAQ

Questions about the tools